Screener
QRMI vs GXIG
Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF vs Global X Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- GXIG costs 0.45% less per year.
- GXIG is significantly larger than QRMI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QRMI is classified as alternative, while GXIG is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- QRMI follows a option income strategy; GXIG uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| QRMI | GXIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $16M | $175M |
| Since | 2021 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 12.36% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.50 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.77% | — |
| Max drawdown | -20.95% | -3.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QRMI and GXIG
Explore further