Screener
QRMI vs RYLG
Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF vs Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF
Key differences
- RYLG costs 0.25% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, RYLG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| QRMI | RYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $16M | $8M |
| Since | 2021 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 12.36% | 7.42% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.1% | +32.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.1% | +13.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.50 | 0.60 |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.77% | 14.94% |
| Max drawdown | -20.95% | -22.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QRMI and RYLG
Explore further