Screener
QSML vs WTV
Wisdomtree U.S. Smallcap Quality Growth Fund vs WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund
Key differences
- WTV costs 0.26% less per year.
- WTV is significantly larger than QSML — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QSML follows a index tracking strategy; WTV uses active selection.
- WTV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QSML | WTV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.12% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11M | $2.8B |
| Since | 2024 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.59% | 1.71% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.9% | +24.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.56% | 11.94% |
| Max drawdown | -28.54% | -42.18% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QSML and WTV
Explore further