Screener
QTAC vs AOR
Q3 All-Season Tactical Advantage ETF vs iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF
Key differences
- AOR costs 1.63% less per year.
- AOR is significantly larger than QTAC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QTAC is classified as alternative, while AOR is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- QTAC follows a multi strategy strategy; AOR uses active selection.
- AOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QTAC | AOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.78% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $54M | $3.5B |
| Since | 2025 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.53% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +21.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +14.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 8.50% |
| Max drawdown | -16.56% | -22.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QTAC and AOR
Explore further