Screener
QTAC vs BDGS
Q3 All-Season Tactical Advantage ETF vs Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
Key differences
- BDGS costs 0.91% less per year.
- QTAC is classified as alternative, while BDGS is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- QTAC follows a multi strategy strategy; BDGS uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| QTAC | BDGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.78% | 0.87% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $54M | $42M |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.53% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +14.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +14.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 6.06% |
| Max drawdown | -16.56% | -9.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QTAC and BDGS
Explore further