Screener
QTAC vs BTR
Q3 All-Season Tactical Advantage ETF vs Beacon Tactical Risk ETF
Key differences
- BTR costs 0.70% less per year.
- QTAC is classified as alternative, while BTR is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- QTAC follows a multi strategy strategy; BTR uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| QTAC | BTR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.78% | 1.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $54M | $37M |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.19% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +20.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 9.77% |
| Max drawdown | -16.56% | -16.67% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QTAC and BTR
Explore further