Screener
QTAC vs IMF
Q3 All-Season Tactical Advantage ETF vs Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF
Key differences
- IMF costs 1.13% less per year.
- IMF is significantly larger than QTAC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QTAC follows a multi strategy strategy; IMF uses managed futures.
Side-by-side comparison
| QTAC | IMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.78% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $54M | $301M |
| Since | 2025 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.89% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | managed futures |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +19.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 10.47% |
| Max drawdown | -16.56% | -15.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QTAC and IMF
Explore further