Screener
QTAC vs RHTX
Q3 All-Season Tactical Advantage ETF vs RH Tactical Outlook ETF
Key differences
- RHTX costs 0.27% less per year.
- QTAC is significantly larger than RHTX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QTAC is classified as alternative, while RHTX is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- QTAC covers north america markets; RHTX covers global.
- QTAC follows a multi strategy strategy; RHTX uses active selection.
- RHTX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QTAC | RHTX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.78% | 1.51% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $54M | $9M |
| Since | 2025 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | multi strategy | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +26.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.10% |
| Max drawdown | -16.56% | -24.68% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QTAC and RHTX
Explore further