Screener
QTAC vs RHRX
Q3 All-Season Tactical Advantage ETF vs RH Tactical Rotation ETF
Key differences
- RHRX costs 0.40% less per year.
- QTAC follows a multi strategy strategy; RHRX uses option income.
- RHRX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QTAC | RHRX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.78% | 1.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $54M | $34M |
| Since | 2025 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +39.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 13.26% |
| Max drawdown | -16.56% | -25.33% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QTAC and RHRX
Explore further