Screener
QTAC vs THIR
Q3 All-Season Tactical Advantage ETF vs THOR Index Rotation ETF
Key differences
- THIR costs 1.09% less per year.
- THIR is significantly larger than QTAC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QTAC is classified as alternative, while THIR is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- QTAC follows a multi strategy strategy; THIR uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| QTAC | THIR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.78% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $54M | $210M |
| Since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.35% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +26.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 11.59% |
| Max drawdown | -16.56% | -10.05% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QTAC and THIR
Explore further