Screener
QTJA vs MFIG
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January vs Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF
Key differences
- MFIG costs 0.29% less per year.
- QTJA is classified as alternative, while MFIG is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- QTJA follows a structured outcome strategy; MFIG uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| QTJA | MFIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $17M | $9M |
| Since | 2021 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.91% | — |
| Max drawdown | -36.09% | -14.29% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QTJA and MFIG
Explore further