Screener
QTJA vs NAPR
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January vs Innovator ETFs Trust
Key differences
- NAPR is significantly larger than QTJA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, QTJA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| QTJA | NAPR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $17M | $216M |
| Since | 2021 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.3% | +20.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.5% | +13.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | 1.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.91% | 4.06% |
| Max drawdown | -36.09% | -16.53% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QTJA and NAPR
Explore further