Screener
QTR vs BHDG
Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF vs Nicholas Bitcoin Tail ETF
Key differences
- BHDG costs 0.25% less per year.
- BHDG is significantly larger than QTR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QTR follows a volatility strategy strategy; BHDG uses option income.
- QTR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QTR | BHDG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3M | $13M |
| Since | 2021 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 17.74% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | volatility strategy | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.25 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.14% | — |
| Max drawdown | -31.72% | -15.07% |
Similar to QTR and BHDG
Explore further