Screener
QTR vs QYLG
Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF vs Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF
Key differences
- QTR costs 0.10% less per year.
- QYLG is significantly larger than QTR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QTR follows a volatility strategy strategy; QYLG uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, QTR has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| QTR | QYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3M | $142M |
| Since | 2021 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 17.74% | 6.59% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | volatility strategy | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.8% | +33.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.2% | +22.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +14.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.25 | 1.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.14% | 12.17% |
| Max drawdown | -31.72% | -29.90% |
Similar to QTR and QYLG
Explore further