Screener
QTR vs RYLG
Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF vs Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF
Key differences
- QTR costs 0.10% less per year.
- QTR follows a volatility strategy strategy; RYLG uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, QTR has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| QTR | RYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3M | $8M |
| Since | 2021 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 17.74% | 7.42% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | volatility strategy | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.8% | +32.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.2% | +13.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.25 | 0.62 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.14% | 14.83% |
| Max drawdown | -31.72% | -22.37% |
Similar to QTR and RYLG
Explore further