Screener
QTR vs RSSL
Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF vs Global X Russell 2000 ETF
Key differences
- RSSL costs 0.17% less per year.
- RSSL is significantly larger than QTR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QTR is classified as alternative, while RSSL is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- QTR follows a volatility strategy strategy; RSSL uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| QTR | RSSL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3M | $1.4B |
| Since | 2021 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 17.74% | 1.33% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | volatility strategy | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.8% | +43.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.25 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.14% | 19.09% |
| Max drawdown | -31.72% | -27.79% |
Similar to QTR and RSSL
Explore further