Skip to content
Screener

QVAL vs ECML

Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF vs Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF

QVAL

Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF

Annual cost

0.28%

Fund size

$530M

ECML

Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$131M

Key differences

Both QVAL and ECML are equity ETFs. QVAL charges 0.28% a year and ECML 0.95%. The main difference: QVAL follows a systematic alpha strategy; ECML uses active selection.

  • QVAL follows a systematic alpha strategy; ECML uses active selection.
  • QVAL costs 0.67% less per year.
  • QVAL is much larger than ECML. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, QVAL has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • QVAL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

QVALECML
Annual cost (TER)0.28%0.95%
Fund size (AUM)$530M$131M
Since20142023
Dividend yield1.46%1.22%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategysystematic alphaactive selection
CAGR 1Y+31.5%+29.9%
CAGR 3Y+20.7%+14.7%
CAGR 5Y+12.6%N/A
Sharpe 3Y0.970.65
Volatility 1Y14.57%14.72%
Max drawdown-51.49%-24.66%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

See all growth funds

Similar to QVAL and ECML