Screener
QVML vs RPV
Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF
Key differences
- QVML costs 0.24% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, QVML has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RPV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QVML | RPV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.11% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6B | $1.8B |
| Since | 2021 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.04% | 2.33% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.7% | +27.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.9% | +18.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.22 | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.85% | 12.77% |
| Max drawdown | -23.52% | -50.67% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QVML and RPV
Explore further