Screener
QVML vs RFV
Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value ETF
Key differences
- QVML costs 0.24% less per year.
- QVML is significantly larger than RFV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, QVML has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RFV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QVML | RFV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.11% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6B | $313M |
| Since | 2021 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.04% | 1.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.7% | +23.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.9% | +15.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.22 | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.85% | 18.24% |
| Max drawdown | -23.52% | -52.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QVML and RFV
Explore further