Screener
QVML vs SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
Key differences
- SPHQ is significantly larger than QVML — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPHQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QVML | SPHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.11% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6B | $17.3B |
| Since | 2021 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 1.04% | 1.11% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.6% | +24.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.8% | +22.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +15.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.22 | 1.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.84% | 12.73% |
| Max drawdown | -23.52% | -31.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QVML and SPHQ
Explore further