Screener
QVMM vs XMHQ
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
Key differences
- QVMM costs 0.10% less per year.
- XMHQ is significantly larger than QVMM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XMHQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QVMM | XMHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $408M | $5.2B |
| Since | 2021 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.19% | 0.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.7% | +14.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.0% | +16.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.77 | 0.71 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.44% | 15.63% |
| Max drawdown | -24.00% | -36.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QVMM and XMHQ
Explore further