Screener
XMHQ vs QVML
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF
Key differences
- QVML costs 0.14% less per year.
- XMHQ is significantly larger than QVML — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, QVML has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XMHQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| XMHQ | QVML | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.11% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.2B | $1.6B |
| Since | 2006 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.58% | 1.04% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.0% | +30.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.2% | +22.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.71 | 1.22 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.63% | 11.84% |
| Max drawdown | -36.90% | -23.52% |
Similar to XMHQ and QVML
Explore further