Screener
QVMS vs GRPZ
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF vs Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF
Key differences
- QVMS costs 0.20% less per year.
- QVMS is significantly larger than GRPZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| QVMS | GRPZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $232M | $3M |
| Since | 2021 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.15% | 0.90% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.8% | +25.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.65 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.73% | 17.82% |
| Max drawdown | -28.05% | -27.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QVMS and GRPZ
Explore further