Screener
QVOY vs AOA
Q3 All-Season Active Rotation ETF vs iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
Key differences
- AOA costs 1.17% less per year.
- AOA is significantly larger than QVOY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QVOY follows a active selection strategy; AOA uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, AOA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AOA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QVOY | AOA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.32% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $60M | $3.0B |
| Since | 2022 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.52% | 2.12% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.0% | +26.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.4% | +17.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.60 | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.56% | 10.72% |
| Max drawdown | -17.05% | -28.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QVOY and AOA
Explore further