Screener
QVOY vs XRLX
Q3 All-Season Active Rotation ETF vs FundX Conservative ETF
Key differences
- XRLX costs 0.12% less per year.
- XRLX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QVOY | XRLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.32% | 1.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $60M | $51M |
| Since | 2022 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 0.52% | 2.68% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.0% | +18.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.60 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.56% | 8.13% |
| Max drawdown | -17.05% | -15.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QVOY and XRLX
Explore further