Screener
QYLD vs BKCH
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF vs Global X Blockchain ETF
Key differences
- BKCH costs 0.10% less per year.
- QYLD is significantly larger than BKCH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QYLD is classified as alternative, while BKCH is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- QYLD follows a option income strategy; BKCH uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, BKCH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- QYLD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QYLD | BKCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8.3B | $314M |
| Since | 2013 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 11.47% | 1.73% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.1% | +108.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.3% | +61.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.71% | 70.40% |
| Max drawdown | -24.75% | -91.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QYLD and BKCH
Explore further