Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

QYLD vs EDGQ

Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF vs Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF

QYLD

Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF

Global X Funds

Annual cost

0.60%

Fund size

$8.3B

EDGQ

Global X Nasdaq-100 Income Edge ETF

Annual cost

Fund size

Key differences

  • QYLD is classified as alternative, while EDGQ is equity — different risk/return profiles.
  • QYLD follows a option income strategy; EDGQ uses active selection.

Side-by-side comparison

QYLDEDGQ
Annual cost (TER)0.60%
Fund size (AUM)$8.3B
Since2013
Dividend yield11.47%
Asset classalternativeequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyoption incomeactive selection
CAGR 1Y+24.7%N/A
CAGR 3Y+14.1%N/A
CAGR 5Y+8.8%N/A
Sharpe 3Y0.81N/A
Volatility 1Y8.72%
Max drawdown-24.75%-7.84%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to QYLD and EDGQ