Screener
QYLD vs RYLG
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF vs Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF
Key differences
- RYLG costs 0.25% less per year.
- QYLD is significantly larger than RYLG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, QYLD has delivered higher annualized returns.
- QYLD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QYLD | RYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8.3B | $8M |
| Since | 2013 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 11.47% | 7.42% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.7% | +32.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.1% | +13.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 0.60 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.72% | 14.94% |
| Max drawdown | -24.75% | -22.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QYLD and RYLG
Explore further