Screener
RAAX vs IFGL
VanEck Real Assets ETF vs iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF
Key differences
- IFGL costs 0.21% less per year.
- RAAX is significantly larger than IFGL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RAAX is classified as alternative, while IFGL is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- RAAX follows a active selection strategy; IFGL uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, RAAX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IFGL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RAAX | IFGL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.48% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $905M | $88M |
| Since | 2018 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.93% | 3.68% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +37.4% | +11.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | +7.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.2% | -1.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.23 | 0.32 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.64% | 13.68% |
| Max drawdown | -33.91% | -40.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RAAX and IFGL
Explore further