Screener
RAAX vs XFLX
VanEck Real Assets ETF vs FundX Flexible ETF
Key differences
- RAAX costs 0.28% less per year.
- RAAX is significantly larger than XFLX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RAAX is classified as alternative, while XFLX is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- XFLX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RAAX | XFLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.97% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $905M | $49M |
| Since | 2018 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 1.93% | 9.73% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +37.4% | +5.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.23 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.64% | 3.53% |
| Max drawdown | -33.91% | -6.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RAAX and XFLX
Explore further