Screener
RAAX vs XNAV
VanEck Real Assets ETF vs FundX Aggressive ETF
Key differences
- RAAX costs 0.58% less per year.
- RAAX is significantly larger than XNAV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, XNAV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RAAX | XNAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 1.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $905M | $31M |
| Since | 2018 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 1.93% | 0.51% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +37.4% | +44.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | +25.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.23 | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.64% | 16.54% |
| Max drawdown | -33.91% | -24.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RAAX and XNAV
Explore further