Screener
RBUF vs SPLV
Innovator U.S. Small Cap 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly vs Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF
Key differences
- SPLV costs 0.54% less per year.
- SPLV is significantly larger than RBUF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RBUF is classified as alternative, while SPLV is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- RBUF follows a structured outcome strategy; SPLV uses index tracking.
- SPLV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RBUF | SPLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $86M | $7.2B |
| Since | 2024 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.11% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.2% | +4.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +8.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.45 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.36% | 9.71% |
| Max drawdown | -11.36% | -36.26% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RBUF and SPLV
Explore further