Screener
RBUF vs XMLV
Innovator U.S. Small Cap 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly vs Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF
Key differences
- XMLV costs 0.54% less per year.
- XMLV is significantly larger than RBUF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RBUF is classified as alternative, while XMLV is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- RBUF follows a structured outcome strategy; XMLV uses index tracking.
- XMLV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RBUF | XMLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $86M | $750M |
| Since | 2024 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.80% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.2% | +10.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +11.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.36% | 10.30% |
| Max drawdown | -11.36% | -39.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RBUF and XMLV
Explore further