Screener
RDOG vs HDEF
ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF vs Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF
Key differences
- HDEF costs 0.26% less per year.
- HDEF is significantly larger than RDOG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RDOG covers north america markets; HDEF covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, HDEF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RDOG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RDOG | HDEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11M | $2.3B |
| Since | 2008 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 6.31% | 3.54% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.3% | +20.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.3% | +17.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.5% | +10.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.57 | 1.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.70% | 11.60% |
| Max drawdown | -49.35% | -36.43% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RDOG and HDEF
Explore further