Screener
RDOG vs RFFC
ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF vs ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF
Key differences
- RDOG costs 0.13% less per year.
- RDOG follows a index tracking strategy; RFFC uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, RFFC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RDOG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RDOG | RFFC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.48% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11M | $29M |
| Since | 2008 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 6.31% | 0.74% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.3% | +29.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.3% | +21.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.5% | +12.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.57 | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.70% | 12.11% |
| Max drawdown | -49.35% | -36.26% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RDOG and RFFC
Explore further