Screener
RFFC vs IDOG
ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF vs ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
Key differences
- IDOG is significantly larger than RFFC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RFFC covers north america markets; IDOG covers europe.
- RFFC follows a active selection strategy; IDOG uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| RFFC | IDOG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $528M |
| Since | 2016 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 0.74% | 3.51% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | europe |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.1% | +35.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.9% | +21.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.6% | +13.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | 1.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | 13.34% |
| Max drawdown | -36.26% | -37.32% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RFFC and IDOG
Explore further