Skip to content
Screener

RDTE vs RYLD

Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF vs Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF

RDTE

Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF

Annual cost

0.97%

Fund size

$162M

RYLD

Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF

Annual cost

0.60%

Fund size

$1.3B

Key differences

Both RDTE and RYLD are alternative ETFs. RDTE charges 0.97% a year and RYLD 0.60%. The main difference: RYLD costs 0.37% less per year.

  • RYLD costs 0.37% less per year.
  • RYLD is much larger than RDTE. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • RYLD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

RDTERYLD
Annual cost (TER)0.97%0.60%
Fund size (AUM)$162M$1.3B
Since20242019
Dividend yield45.02%11.65%
Asset classalternativealternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyoption incomeoption income
CAGR 1Y+27.0%+20.5%
CAGR 3YN/A+7.4%
CAGR 5YN/A+2.5%
Sharpe 3YN/A0.34
Volatility 1Y17.22%10.71%
Max drawdown-24.32%-41.52%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to RDTE and RYLD