Skip to content
Screener

RYLD vs QDTE

Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF vs Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF

RYLD

Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF

Annual cost

0.60%

Fund size

$1.3B

QDTE

Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF

Annual cost

0.96%

Fund size

$881M

Key differences

Both RYLD and QDTE are alternative ETFs. RYLD charges 0.60% a year and QDTE 0.96%. The main difference: RYLD costs 0.36% less per year.

  • RYLD costs 0.36% less per year.
  • RYLD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

RYLDQDTE
Annual cost (TER)0.60%0.96%
Fund size (AUM)$1.3B$881M
Since20192024
Dividend yield11.65%42.49%
Asset classalternativealternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyoption incomeoption income
CAGR 1Y+20.5%+34.1%
CAGR 3Y+7.4%N/A
CAGR 5Y+2.5%N/A
Sharpe 3Y0.34N/A
Volatility 1Y10.71%15.99%
Max drawdown-41.52%-22.86%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to RYLD and QDTE