Screener
REFA vs CGIC
Columbia Research Enhanced International Equity ETF vs Capital Group International Core Equity ETF
Key differences
- REFA follows a index tracking strategy; CGIC uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| REFA | CGIC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.54% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $1.7B |
| Since | — | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.38% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +32.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.05% |
| Max drawdown | -11.24% | -13.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to REFA and CGIC
Explore further