Screener
REGS vs REVS
Columbia ETF Trust I - Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF vs Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF
Key differences
- REGS follows a active selection strategy; REVS uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| REGS | REVS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $284M |
| Since | — | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.97% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +27.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +11.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 11.63% |
| Max drawdown | -7.43% | -37.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to REGS and REVS
Explore further