Skip to content
Screener

REK vs ROM

ProShares Short Real Estate vs ProShares Ultra Technology

REK

ProShares Short Real Estate

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$11M

ROM

ProShares Ultra Technology

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$1.4B

Key differences

Both REK and ROM are equity ETFs. REK charges 0.95% a year and ROM 0.95%. The main difference: REK follows a inverse strategy; ROM uses leveraged.

  • REK follows a inverse strategy; ROM uses leveraged.
  • ROM is much larger than REK. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, ROM has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

REKROM
Annual cost (TER)0.95%0.95%
Fund size (AUM)$11M$1.4B
Since20102007
Dividend yield3.29%0.14%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyinverseleveraged
CAGR 1Y-5.9%+114.2%
CAGR 3Y-4.3%+54.7%
CAGR 5Y-0.6%+28.0%
Sharpe 3Y-0.391.07
Volatility 1Y13.79%45.31%
Max drawdown-58.67%-67.55%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to REK and ROM