Screener
ROM vs REW
ProShares Ultra Technology vs ProShares UltraShort Technology
Key differences
- ROM is significantly larger than REW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ROM follows a leveraged strategy; REW uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, ROM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ROM | REW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $961M | $4M |
| Since | 2007 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.21% | 7.20% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +126.3% | -61.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +58.4% | -46.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +29.7% | -39.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.14 | -1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 41.23% | 41.51% |
| Max drawdown | -67.55% | -99.74% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ROM and REW
Explore further