Screener
REM vs MBBA
iShares Mortgage Real Estate Capped ETF vs iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF
Key differences
- MBBA costs 0.23% less per year.
- REM is significantly larger than MBBA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- REM is classified as equity, while MBBA is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- MBBA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| REM | MBBA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $580M | $125M |
| Since | 2007 | 1998 |
| Dividend yield | 8.60% | 3.98% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.42 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.89% | — |
| Max drawdown | -68.52% | -2.83% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to REM and MBBA
Explore further