Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

REMG vs EMC

Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF

REMG

Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF

Russell Investment Management Limited

Annual cost

0.64%

Fund size

$95M

EMC

Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF

Global X Funds

Annual cost

0.65%

Fund size

$61M

Key differences

  • REMG follows a index tracking strategy; EMC uses active selection.
  • EMC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

REMGEMC
Annual cost (TER)0.64%0.65%
Fund size (AUM)$95M$61M
Since20252010
Dividend yield0.70%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyindex trackingactive selection
CAGR 1YN/A+30.7%
CAGR 3YN/A+14.8%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/A0.65
Volatility 1Y20.21%
Max drawdown-14.13%-18.38%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to REMG and EMC