Screener
REMG vs EMM
Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
Key differences
- REMG follows a index tracking strategy; EMM uses active selection.
- EMM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| REMG | EMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.64% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $95M | $58M |
| Since | 2025 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.76% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +54.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.90 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 21.25% |
| Max drawdown | -14.13% | -21.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to REMG and EMM
Explore further