Skip to content
Screener

REMG vs MATE

Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF

REMG

Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF

Annual cost

0.64%

Fund size

$103M

MATE

Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF

Annual cost

0.97%

Fund size

$39M

Key differences

REMG is an equity ETF, while MATE is an alternative ETF. REMG charges 0.64% a year and MATE 0.97%.

  • REMG is an equity fund, while MATE is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • REMG follows a active selection strategy; MATE uses tactical allocation.
  • REMG costs 0.33% less per year.

Side-by-side comparison

REMGMATE
Annual cost (TER)0.64%0.97%
Fund size (AUM)$103M$39M
Since20252025
Dividend yield1.08%
Asset classequityalternative
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyactive selectiontactical allocation
CAGR 1Y+48.4%N/A
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y22.13%
Max drawdown-14.13%-13.24%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

See all growth funds

Similar to REMG and MATE