Screener
REMG vs MEMX
Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF
Key differences
- REMG costs 0.15% less per year.
- REMG follows a index tracking strategy; MEMX uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| REMG | MEMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.64% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $95M | $45M |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +62.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +25.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 21.07% |
| Max drawdown | -14.13% | -19.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to REMG and MEMX
Explore further