Screener
REMX vs SLX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF vs VanEck Steel ETF
Key differences
- REMX is significantly larger than SLX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SLX has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| REMX | SLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.53% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.0B | $159M |
| Since | 2010 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.25% | 1.27% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +165.8% | +80.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.5% | +26.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.8% | +16.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.27 | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 47.82% | 24.19% |
| Max drawdown | -73.34% | -61.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to REMX and SLX
Explore further