Screener
REMX vs HAP
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF vs VanEck Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- HAP costs 0.12% less per year.
- REMX is significantly larger than HAP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, HAP has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| REMX | HAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.53% | 0.41% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.0B | $316M |
| Since | 2010 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 1.25% | 1.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +165.8% | +46.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.5% | +18.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.8% | +11.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| Volatility 1Y | 47.82% | 14.90% |
| Max drawdown | -73.34% | -44.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to REMX and HAP
Explore further