Screener
RETL vs AMZD
Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares vs Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares
Key differences
- RETL costs 0.06% less per year.
- RETL follows a leveraged strategy; AMZD uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, RETL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RETL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RETL | AMZD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.96% | 1.02% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $32M | $17M |
| Since | 2010 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.58% | 3.64% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.5% | -26.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.1% | -26.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -29.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.38 | -0.94 |
| Volatility 1Y | 60.15% | 29.78% |
| Max drawdown | -92.00% | -73.05% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RETL and AMZD
Explore further